If Clive Palmer wins in the high court, is that the top of WA's …


  • analysis
  • nationwide
  • WA
  • Coronavirus pandemic

For our free coronavirus pandemic protection, find out about additional right here.

by the use of Nathan Hondros

July 30, 2020 — 2.27pm

About Palmer
Palmer may check with:

If Clive Palmer wins in the extreme court docket, is that the top of WA's …

About courtroom,

With 723 new cases of COVID-19 stated in Victoria on Thursday, outbreaks in New South Wales and Queensland, and with the virus all however eradicated west of the Nullarbor, West Australians have a transparent message for the jap states: take care of out.

Which is why Clive Palmer’s challenge to WA’s ‘laborious border’ has generated such angst – and why the Commonwealth’s transfer to sign up in his movement and query the closure’s constitutionality has compounded that angst.

If Clive Palmer wins in the excessive courtroom, is that the highest of WA's …



many people are afraid. On Thursday by myself there were 13 deaths reported in Victoria. That state faces many further in the days and months upfront.

there isn’t any question there is excessive common toughen for WA’s laborious border. Social media is awash with it. there is a web-based petition in beef up of shielding the WA border closed and blasting the “outside our bodies” who’re taking WA to court docket: they are “intrusive and offensive”. it’s inching in opposition to 200,000 signatures.


then again what’s at stake if Mr Palmer wins? If WA loses, does this imply there could be no border protections for WA?

not consistent with high Minister Scott Morrison, who argued on Wednesday the constitutional downside with WA’s border coverage used to be its “all or nothing” rejection of any other Australian seeking to come again right right here with out an exemption.

“Let me be clear, we aren’t helping Clive Palmer,” he said.

“The constitutional position is one that gives for there to be free movement of Australians across borders, that’s what a federation is, and that that free movement will have to no longer be averted.

“I warned the states and territories that in the experience that they make arbitrary positions on borders that they’re inclined to in finding themselves in this scenario, that somebody is extra likely to ship a case and that this will increasingly more neatly crystallise a constitutional position that would no longer be to their benefit.”

legal professional commonplace Christian Porter stated the compromise could be to “very cautiously in a staged, good, jurisdiction with assistance from jurisdiction approach, start to open your borders”.

“What that avoids is the chance is that in October or November you will have an hostile discovering throughout the excessive court docket that requires you to do the entire thing in an instant,” he talked about.

this would possibly possibly result in an end outcome the location WA may limit entry to Australians who have come into contact with a neighborhood struggling a breakout within the pandemic.

on the other hand the feedback from each politicians hint at some other likelihood that can alarm many West Australians. The high court docket may make a decision – consistently with previous alternatives – that WA has extraordinarily narrow powers to forestall Australians crossing their borders.

in that case, a win for Mr Palmer would put severe pressure on the federation. There are already calls on social media for the WA most fascinating to forget a selection of the extreme court docket ensuing throughout the fall of the onerous borders. The outcome of which may be too abnormal to ponder, on the other hand however, the sentiment is not as unique as some wish to imagine.


this kind of win would additionally leave the WA govt ready where it may well be negotiating with Mr Morrison to secure the safety of its electorate. On Wednesday, the high Minster insisted he was “very eager to interact in a technique with the Western Australian government that protects the well being of Western Australians and protects the well being of Australia and the prosperity of Australia”.

this is after the prime Minister warned Mr McGowan his hard border may end in a legal challenge on the way to restrict or cut back WA’s prison means to protect its borders.

And after one of the vital extra attention-grabbing proof within the Federal courtroom this week published the possibilities of a virulent disease in WA remained the same if we just closed our borders to completely different states the place there was nearby transmission of the virus.

WA’s Chief well being Officer Andrew Robertson even conceded there was once little public neatly being justification for maintaining the border closed to South Australia, the Northern Territory, Queensland, the ACT and Tasmania, which had eradicated staff spread.

As WAtoday‘s Heather McNeill said, Dr Robertson instructed the courtroom he had written to the state govt suggesting it believe a go from side to side bubble with SA and NT. however he did not hear once more.

So, if Clive Palmer is a hit in his high court docket docket problem, which may have absolutely been kept away from, who’s really responsible?

it’s a query West Australians most for sure it will likely be asking themselves within the lead as a lot as the March state election.

License this text

  • Coronavirus pandemic
  • prognosis
  • Clive Palmer
  • Scott Morrison
  • extreme court docket of Australia
  • Perth
Nathan Hondros
  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • e-mail

Nathan is WAtoday’s political reporter and the winner of the 2019 Arthur Lovekin Prize for Excellence in Journalism.